Is O'Donnell Really So Bad?

Christine O'Donnell took a loooonnnnnggggggg time to pay off her student loans. They say her home was foreclosed on. She dated some guy in high school and subsequently dabbled in witchcraft, which she ultimately rejected.

First of all, she will do fine if she can get the votes of the millions of Americans who can sympathize with her financial problems and who have also defaulted on a loan and have had their homes foreclosed. Trust me, there's a lot of 'em. I suppose excluding anyone with financial problems would go a long way in protecting Washington's elite since there would be virtually no one to run against them. But to make things fair, Charlie Rangle, Tim Geitner, and a multitude of other Obama henchmen and cabinet members might want to step down.

And witchcraft? I played ouija in high school. Does that count? Cm'on! This was a 17 year-old HIGH SCHOOL student who had a momentary lapse of judgement by dating some guy who was into witchcraft. But, hey, she didn't like it and she certainly did not inhale. Besides, it's not like she was a 40-something first lady of the United States holding seances to talk to Eleanor Roosevelt. O'Donnell is obviously no more a witch than Obama is a Muslim.

Then look at the seat she's seeking. She defeated in the primary a mainstay who you would not even know was a Republican but for the (R) after his name. In the general election she now faces a self-avowed Marxist in Chris Coon for the senate seat vacated by Joe Biden when he somehow became vice-president. Besides being a serial plagiarist, Biden has shown himself time and again to be a bigger moron than George W. Bush. All alternatives considered, O'Donnell seems like a big win for everyone.

What Is Wrong With Tea Party?

No, really. What is so wrong with what we are doing? Why are WE considered by media to be the radicals?

When did it become "radical" to balance your checkbook? Why is it a "fringe" idea to expect to keep more than half of the money you earn? How is it racist to include people of all races as long as they, too, believe in liberty.

The only mention of race I've seen, even on all the signs, was the statement that "We reject Obama based not on the color of his skin, but on the content of his Marxist/socialist character". That is precisely what Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. taught us. It has zero to do with his color and 100% to do with his destructive policies. Nearly every "racist" Tea Party member LOVES Clarence Thomas, certainly not because he's white but because he judges fairly, based on the Constitution rather than twisting the Constitution to appear to match up with their Marxist agenda.

It is almost comical how the Tea Party, with its blue-haired grannies, soccer moms, and peaceful protesters (still looking for signs of all the "violence and racism" these people supposedly incite) are considered radical while the Obama administration, with its ties to Cass Sunstein, Andy Stern, Bill Ayers, Van Jones, etc. and their policies that anyone can see would enslave our nation for generations is considered "mainstream".

In Defense of Capitalism

Here are some great quotes from former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. What a wise, wise woman she was!

"It is not the creation of wealth that is wrong, but the love of money for its own sake."

"No one would remember the Good Samaritan if he'd only had good intentions; he had money as well."

"Pennies do not come from heaven. They have to be earned here on earth."

"To cure the British disease with socialism was like trying to cure leukaemia with leeches."

"The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money."

Imam vs American People

I guess we see where the left stands if it is left solely up to them about the Ground Zero Islamic center. You only need to ask yourself 2 questions:

1. Who is more likely to be funded by foreigners: Ground Zero Imam or Americans For Prosperity? I'm talking like millions of times more likely.

2. Who is the left more CONCERNED about being funded by foreigners?